Papers with peer reviewing
GrapAL: Connecting the Dots in Scientific Literature (P19-3)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several software tools are available to help researchers perform tasks such as searching for papers, assessing applicants for a research position and keeping track of papers published on topics of interest. |
| Approach: | They introduce a graph database of academic literature with an intuitive schema and query language . they open source the demo code to help other researchers develop applications that build on it . |
| Outcome: | The proposed tool can be used to find experts on a given topic for peer review, find indirect connections between biomedical entities, and compute citation-based metrics. |
Does My Rebuttal Matter? Insights from a Major NLP Conference (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Peer review is a core element of the scientific process, but few studies have evaluated its properties empirically. |
| Approach: | They propose to use peer review to assess the effectiveness of rebuttal phase in NLP conferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task predicts after-rebuttal scores from initial reviews and author responses. |
Uncertainty Aware Review Hallucination for Science Article Classification (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Korbinian Friedl, Georgios Rizos, Lukas Stappen, Madina Hasan, Lucia Specia, Thomas Hain, Björn Schuller
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to peer review support are limited in their use of available information and subjectivity. |
| Approach: | They propose to use aleatory uncertainty and loss importance interpolations to model review representations at test time to provide a realistic evaluation framework. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework makes better use of the available information and is realistic with respect to the limitations set by the task 1 . |
Recommending Missed Citations Identified by Reviewers: A New Task, Dataset and Baselines (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing citation recommendation systems aim to recommend a list of scientific papers for a given text context or a draft paper. |
| Approach: | They propose a task of Recommending Missed Citations Identified by Reviewers to help improve citations of full papers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods in all metrics and will motivate future research on this challenging task. |